2028 US52stars 2036
U.S. Presidential Elections 2032
Seanparker Adamkinzinger Joelrivera
Nominee Sean Parker Adam Kinzinger Joel Rivera
Party Independant Republican Democratic
Home state California Illinois New York
Running mate Ret. Gen. Laura Richardson Jaime Herrera Beutler Kasim Reed
Electoral vote 213 202 123
States carried 22 21 14
Percentage 29.76% 28.37% 29.61%
Nominee Tom Cotton
Party Conservative

Home state Arkansas
Running mate Alex Looysen
Electoral vote 0
States carried 0
Percentage 12.25%

90The 2032 Presidential election was held on November 2nd, 2032, to elect the President of the United States. Independent California Governor and internet entrepreneur Sean Parker narrowly defeated sitting president New Republican Adam Kinzinger, Democratic nominee former New York Mayor Joel Rivera and Conservative nominee Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton in a four-way race that had to be decided by congress.

The 2032 election is regarded as the closest and most competitive election in modern American history and is credited as being the spark that resulted in a paradigm shift in 21st century American politics. It was the first time an Independent candidate had ever won the presidency and also the first time a presidential election had to be decided by congress since 1824.


The Kinzinger administration had been beset by setbacks such as the continuing recession, energy prices, internal scandals, and continuing tensions in the Middle East. In addition, Kinzinger had alienated much of the conservative base by collaborating with congressional Democrats, ignoring social issues and by appointing a Supreme Court Justice whom many Conservatives had considered liberal. Kinzinger's critics saw him as an inept leader who had failed to solve the worsening economic problems at home.These criticisms came into culmination when Republican North Dakota Governor Kelly Armstrong issued a primary challenge to the president. When the drone hijacking incident occurred in December Kelly used it as an opportunity to lambast Kinzinger's foreign policy record. 


Democratic NominationEdit

Democratic Candidates

  • Joel Rivera (54), former Mayor of New York City
  • Jason Powell (52), U.S. Senator from Tennessee
  • Kasim Reed (63), former Governor of Georgia
  • Alison Lundergan Grimes (56), former Governor of Kentucky

Republican NominationEdit

Republican Candidates

  • Adam Kinzinger (54), President (Nominee)
  • Kelly Armstong (46), Governor of North Dakota

Republican Primary:

Conservative NominationEdit

  • Tom Cotton (58), U.S Senator from Arkansas (Nominee)
  • Mike Lee (60), U.S. Senator from Utah

General Election CampaignEdit

After successfully defeating Governor Armstrong's primary challenge, Kinzinger found himself weakened nationally and still on defense from the right as Conservative nominee long time Senator Tom Cotton continued the challenge that Armstrong had started and picking up his supporters. However polls still showed Kinzinger beating former Democratic nominee Mayor Joel Rivera. Many Democrats expressed disappointment with their uninspiring selection of candidates and were still facing national repercussions for the Chinese trade war. Many had speculated whether the Progressive faction would split and make their own independent run under Vermont Governor Katherine Sims. However this speculation was put to rest in June when California Governor Sean Parker announced his intention to seek the presidency as an independent. 

Parker's dramatic late entry shook up the entire race. He run as a business professional promising to revitalize the ailing economy and playing on the public's concerns about budget deficits and fears of professional politicians. Parker campaigned almost exclusively in cities, crusaded against Washington politicians, the two-party system and political contributions while his wealth allowed him to be largely self financed. His volunteers succeeded in collecting enough signatures to get his name on the ballot in all 50 states. Many Progressive Democrats and business minded Republicans endorsed Parker.

In August, Parker led the national public opinion polls with support from 39% of the voters (versus 31% for Kinzinger and 25% for Rivera). However, polls also frequently showed neither candidate reaching 270 electoral votes and it was expected that the power of electing the president would come down to the Democratic controlled House of Representatives. 



Blue: Democratic Red: New Republican Yellow: Independent

Candidate States won Electoral votes National popular vote
Parker (I)22213 41,091715
Kinzinger (R)2120239,167,049
Rivera (D)1412340,893,912
Cotton (C)0016,917,518

Governor Parker won a plurality in the popular and electoral vote, with . Kinzinger was second in the electoral vote and Rivera third. Because the election was so close it took almost three days before the victor was announced. However, it was clear no candidate would reach 270 electoral votes and there was much consternation in the media as to how congress would select a victor and how legitimate it would be. 

Although Rivera had come second in the popular vote, he was excluded from the vote because he came third in electoral votes. Having to choose between Parker and Kinzinger, the House voted for Parker. Similarly, Laura Richardson won the senate vote.

The table below displays the final official vote percentages by state:

State Electors Parker (I) Kinzinger (R) Rivera (D) Cotton (C)
Alabama 9 19.16%39.94%26.52%14.15%
Alaska 3 34.67%31.66%20.49%12.92%
Arizona 13 31.13%28.05%28.04%12.68%
Arkansas 6 20.72%27.73%25.23%26.32%
California 56 40.56%16.44%34.11%8.89%
Colorado 10 35.94%24.51%30.11%10.38%
Connecticut 6 29.89%30.86%30.89%8.17%
D.C. 3 19.67%9.02%69.94%1.37%
Delaware 3 34.36%30.64%29.99%5.37%
Florida 30 27.66%32.06%27.15%13.13%
Georgia 17 27.12%29.50%31.95%11.43%
Hawaii 4 25.61%28.01%40.88%5.51%
Idaho 4 38.01%36.53%11.30%14.16%
Illinois 18 28.07%32.48%31.29%8.16%
Indiana 10 27.25%32.04%31.27%9.44%
Iowa 6 27.25%29.37%31.80%11.59%
Kansas 6 33.84%21.65%23.68%20.83%
Kentucky 8 22.51%34.43%32.86%10.20%
Louisiana 6 20.83%34.28%31.74%13.15%
Maine 4 43.03%27.95%24.43%4.56%
Maryland 10 23.86%29.47%39.33%7.34%
Massachusetts 10 31.94%27.30%32.41%8.35%
Michigan 12 27.91%25.43%33.20%13.46%
Minnesota 10 32.42%28.84%31.96%6.78%
Mississippi 6 17.05%30.84%33.65%18.45%
Missouri 7 30.30%31.15%29.46%9.09%
Montana 3 33.60%30.15%25.99%10.27%
Nebraska* 4 35.85%35.17%14.99%9.21%
Nevada 7 33.61%30.43%26.76%9.21%
New Hampshire 4 33.35%32.93%25.07%6.09%
New Jersey 13 32.15%33.25%28.51%6.09%
New Mexico 5 25.13%33.26%36.02%5.60%
New York 26 32.38%25.27%33.27%9.08%
North Carolina 17 32.35%24.99%31.25%11.52%
North Dakota 4 29.75%35.27%23.51%19.63%
Ohio 15 28.92%34.12%27.15%9.75%
Oklahoma 7 29.99%34.70%16.40%18.92%
Oregon 8 36.51%23.51%32.11%7.88%
Pennsylvania 18 31.15%32.05%28.38%8.42%
Puerto Rico 5 26.79%29.45%40.30%1.12%
Rhode Island 3 32.21%33.46%29.84%4.35%
South Carolina 10 19.69%32.21%31.90%16.20%
South Dakota 3 27.30%29.90%19.20%20.57%
Tennessee 11 19.41%33.20%37.02%10.36%
Texas 44 29.50%27.90%26.52%16.08%
Utah 7 32.64%34.90%10.95%21.50%
Vermont 3 41.69%21.56%32.19%4.56%
Virginia 15 21.84%35.92%31.50%10.75%
Washington 13 37.13%29.17%26.90%6.80%
West Virginia 4 25.33%27.15%24.21%23.31%
Wisconsin 8 31.65%32.87%25.96%9.52%
Wyoming 3 36.58%30.48%18.99%13.96%